 TDUBB
|
Date: July 25, 2005 @ 4:59 PM
i tried to listen to your song but it has no sound
|
 egac
|
Date: July 25, 2005 @ 5:04 PM
exactly......its an interpretation of John Cage’s 4-33
|
 imemine
|
Date: July 25, 2005 @ 5:13 PM
Studied this piece in college 100 years ago. Interesting interpretation.
|
TDUBB
|
Date: July 25, 2005 @ 5:14 PM
oh aiight i got you . i didnt know cause i never heard of that my bad 
|
 Apertome
|
Date: July 25, 2005 @ 5:21 PM
damn ... someone's really banging on those keys! Ends kinda abruptly, but I guess time'll do that to you. Nice ambience.
|
Dexter
|
Date: July 25, 2005 @ 5:21 PM
|
Alexsy
|
Date: August 3, 2005 @ 7:18 PM
well, i only learned about this track from ime. but it really is a fascinating idea, and it's amazing how intricate ambient noises actually are. while there's no "music" per se for a vast majority of the piece, there's lots of sounds. this is a really cool thing.
|
kingo
|
Date: August 12, 2005 @ 7:52 PM
|
 freddemillio
|
Date: August 20, 2005 @ 7:41 AM
I think that you might have exaggerated on the harmonic content, but the melody flows perfectly.
|
PrincessTast...
|
Date: November 8, 2005 @ 11:47 AM
John Cage-a-licious 
|
olethros
|
Date: January 30, 2006 @ 6:08 PM
Aha, an interesting variation - you have replaced the ensemble with a solist playing multiple instruments 
|
egac
|
Date: January 31, 2006 @ 2:06 AM
it’s actually a duet if you can believe it?
|
hantu
|
Date: September 5, 2007 @ 5:25 AM
|
You must be logged in to leave a comment
|
